Sample 1 of 6
Top fixes, in order
In: Full manuscript review (revision plan) · Developmental assessment
Every full review starts with what to fix first. The biggest fixes come first, the quick wins are flagged with how long they take, and the work that isn't worth your time is named so you can skip it.
Do these three first
1. Commit to the genre and reshape the climax to match. 2. Rebuild the financial-legal engine so the money is followable. 3. Correct the pacing inversion.
Quick wins, timed
Fix the POV shift at line 2997. Time: 2 minutes. Search for “just” and delete every instance where the sentence survives without it. Time: 30 minutes, across 162 instances.
From real client reports, used with permission. Names and identifying details changed.
Open the sample PDF (2 pages, 507 KB)
Sample 2 of 6
Chapter evaluation table
In: Developmental assessment · Full manuscript review
Every chapter is scored 1–5 for structure, pacing and character, with what works, what weakens it, quick wins with time estimates, and a one-line verdict. You can see at a glance where the book is strong and where it sags.
Scores for every chapter
Ch 1: Structure 4/5 · Pacing 3/5 · Character 5/5. Ch 8: Structure 4/5 · Pacing 2/5 · Character 3/5.
Verdict on a weak chapter
“Redundant. Consolidate into Chapter 14 and let the combined fight go somewhere the individual fights never do.”
From real client reports, used with permission. Names and identifying details changed.
Open the sample PDF (3 pages, 371 KB)
Sample 3 of 6
Line-level scorecard
In: Chapter-by-chapter line report · Full manuscript review
The sentence-level patterns, counted across the whole manuscript: filter words, passive voice, dialogue tags, clichés, repeated words and sentence openings. The counts show what is already strong as well as what to work on, so you don’t spend revision time on a problem you don’t have.
Measured, not guessed
Filter words: 2.8 per 1,000 words. Exceptional. “If you have been told your filter-word usage is a major problem, that assessment did not match the text.”
A word to cut
“just”: 162 instances. Target deleting 60% (roughly 97). Your single highest-impact quick win.
From real client reports, used with permission. Names and identifying details changed.
Open the sample PDF (3 pages, 322 KB)
Sample 4 of 6
Reader-response table
In: Reader-response report · Full manuscript review
How the book is likely to land with readers, chapter by chapter: emotional impact, pacing and engagement. Specific findings are rated by importance, located in your text and paired with a suggested fix. Simulated reader profiles are always labeled as simulated.
Chapter by chapter
Ch VI: Nostalgia, Affection, Curiosity · Pacing: Slow · Engagement: Medium. Ch XII: Fear, Anxiety, Relief · Dynamic · High.
A finding, located, with a fix
Minor: Clara says she is “terrible at dancing” in Chapter IV, then dances well in the same chapter. Suggested fix: a brief moment of her partner guiding her, making her improved dancing more plausible.
From real client reports, used with permission. Names and identifying details changed.
Open the sample PDF (3 pages, 386 KB)
Sample 5 of 6
Cross-check: where the reviews disagreed
In: Full manuscript review (appendix) · the same process sits behind every report
Your manuscript goes through several separate reviews. When they disagree, we don’t average them. Each disputed claim is checked against your pages, and the report shows you where the reviews differed and how each difference was settled.
Two reads, side by side
Consistency & World-Building: the more critical read 40, the favourable read higher, calibrated final 65. Line-Level Craft: 55, markedly higher, final 82.
Settled against your pages
“Where the two reads differed by more than a handful of points, the disputed claim was not averaged — it was checked against the manuscript itself.”
From real client reports, used with permission. Names and identifying details changed.
Open the sample PDF (3 pages, 505 KB)
Sample 6 of 6
Continuity check
In: Developmental assessment · Full manuscript review
The small slips that are hard to see after the tenth read-through: ages that don’t add up, names that change, a point of view that wobbles, a typo in chapter one. Each one is located in the text with the fix.
Ages that don’t add up
In Chapter 10 the daughters are eight and six. By Chapter 39, about fourteen months later, they are eight and ten.
A name that changes
The holding company is “Harrow Securities LLC” when first named (Chapter 5) and “Harrow Investments” everywhere after.
From real client reports, used with permission. Names and identifying details changed.
Open the sample PDF (2 pages, 295 KB)